Federal Law > Unions > Right To Work

Right To Work

 

"Right to work" is a common phrase in employment relations. It has its origin in the relationship between unions and employers. Essentially, it concerns the rights of employees to choose to become members of unions and/or to contribute union dues promotive of union activities. In order to understand the respective rights of employers and employees in the "right to work" area, some additional background discussion is helpful.

Federal labor law. The National Labor Relations Act, enacted in 1947, defines the essential rights of employers and employees concerning union representation. Under Section 7 of the Act, employees have the following primary rights:

". . . the right to self organization, to form, join or assist labor organizations, to bargain collectively through representatives of their own choosing, and to engage in other concerted activities for the purpose of collective bargaining or other mutual aid or protection. . ."

Once a majority of employees in an appropriate unit have selected a union as their bargaining representative, the relationship between the employer and the employees changes. Unions are businesses. In order to run their businesses effectively, unions need to collect union dues to remain economically viable. As a consequence, union security arrangements, (agreements through which unions collect dues,) are of critical importance in the now "three-way relationship" between employers, unions, and employees.

Union security agreements. Federal labor legislation permits a variety of "union security" agreements. Union security agreements are contracts through which unions can demand dues payments even from employees who are not interested in becoming union members. Federal law permits unions to collect union dues under a variety of circumstances in order to prevent "free loaders" from reaping the benefits of union representation while not paying dues for the union's assistance. However, even where federal law may allow a union to force union membership or dues payments, state "right to work" laws can restrict a union's efforts to demand union membership from employees.

Union shop. The most stringent form of union security agreement allowed under federal law is the union shop. Under this agreement, employees must join a union once they begin employment or within thirty (30) days after the effective date of the union contract, whichever is later. Union shop agreements require two elements:

1. The union may not discriminate against eligible employees for membership although the union can define its own rules of eligibility for its members.

2. The union must represent a majority of the employees in the bargaining unit.

Maintenance of membership. Under federal law, an employer and a union may enter into a "maintenance of membership" clause which requires that all employees who are union members or who become union members remain in good standing. To maintain their good standing, those union members must continue to pay union dues.

Agency shop. Under an agency shop arrangement, employees are not required to join the union but they must pay the union "support money" in order to reimburse the union for the costs of administration of the contract. The aforementioned union security arrangements are the most typical contract provisions permitted under federal law for unions to obtain some "security" for the payment of union dues and fees.

"Right to Work" state laws. States are permitted under Section 14(b) of the Taft Hartley Act to adopt union security laws which are more restrictive than federal law. As an example, states can ban contract clauses which create union shops or agency shops between employers and unions in their states. In this instance, federal law will not supersede more restrictive state law. Among those states which have laws or constitutional requirements prohibiting union security arrangements are the following:

Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Nebraska, Nevada, North Carolina, North Dakota, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, and Wyoming.

With the exceptions of Arizona, Florida, Kansas, Nevada, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Texas, the above-named states outlaw agency shop arrangements because they specifically forbid the exaction of union fees from persons who are not members of unions.

In the states not listed above, employers and unions are not prohibited from more restrictive union security contract clauses. However, even many states which do not have "right to work" laws still impose some restrictive provisions upon how unions seek dues and fees from employees within the bargaining unit. An employer is well advised to seek the assistance of competent counsel in analyzing the relationship between federal and state law in order to determine an employer's obligations concerning union security arrangements within your state. Not only can an employer's pocket book and relationships with its employees be dramatically altered by "union security"contract clauses, but employees often times take a very independent and strong stance on the issue of their obligation to pay union dues, particularly if it is their preference not to join the union.

Login to read more.

Related Articles

07/05/2018 NLRB Changes Rules on Employee Handbook Policies
12/14/2017 NLRB General Counsel Issues Memo Asking for Review of Many Obama Board Decisions
10/10/2017 President Trump Nominates New NLRB General Counsel; Majority of NLRB Has Now Changed
01/31/2017 President Trump Names Lipnic to Head EEOC and Miscimarra to Head NLRB
01/09/2015 NLRB Charges McDonald's as a Joint Employer with its Franchisees
08/05/2014 NLRB Officials Ratify Agency Action Taken During Period When Supreme Court Held Board Members Not Appropriately Appointed
01/07/2014 NLRB Does Not Seek Review of Decisions Invalidating Notice Posting Rule
09/12/2013 NLRB Launches Mobile App with Information About National Labor Relations Act
02/01/2013 Now What? D.C. Circuit Rules Appointments to NLRB Unconstitutional
04/27/2012 NLRB Posting Rule Postponed
09/01/2011 NLRB Issues New Posting Rule on Notification of Employee Rights Under NLRA
02/01/2011 Proposed NLRB Notice Could Cause Uptick in Union Activity
01/27/2011 NLRB Advises Attorneys General in Four States that Secret-Ballot Amendments are Preempted by Federal Labor Law
01/02/2011 NLRB Activism Update: Acting General Counsel Directs Remedies Initiative, NLRB Proposes Rights Notice
05/28/2010 Executive Order 13496: Notification of Employee Rights Under Federal Labor Laws
05/25/2010 DOL Issues Final Regulations regarding Contractor Obligation to Notify Employees of Organizing Rights (EO 13496)
01/22/2010 EXECUTIVE ORDER 13496: Are You Prepared to Post a Federal Notice Encouraging Your Employees to Organize?
 

HR CARE®
MEMBER LOGIN

Username: *

Password: *
Accept terms *
Login failed.
 
copyright 2000 - 2018 Curtis Communications, Inc. All rights reserved. | Access to the HR Care publications is subject to certain terms and conditions.
Learn about our online compliance training at www.hrclassroom.com